Four Roles in Social Change

Helper

Effective:

  • Assists people in ways that affirm their dignity and respect
  • Shares skills and brings clients into decision-making roles
  • Educates about the larger social system
  • Encourages experiments in service delivery which support liberation

Ineffective:

  • Believes charity can handle social problems, or that helping individuals can change social structures
  • Focuses on casualties and refuses to see who benefits from victimization
  • Provides services like job training which simply give some people a competitive edge over other people, without challenging the scarcity which gives rise to competition

Advocate

Effective:

  • Uses mainstream institutions like courts, city hall, legislatures to get new goals and values adopted
  • Uses lobbying, lawsuits, elite networking/coalition-building for clearly-stated demands, often backed by research
  • Monitors successes to make sure they are implemented

Ineffective:

  • “Realistic politics”: promotes minor reforms acceptable to power-holders
  • Promotes domination by top-down professional advocacy groups
  • More concerned with organization’s status than the goal of their social movement
  • Identifies more with powerholders than with grassroots
  • Does not like paradigm shifts

Rebel

Effective:

  • Protests: says “no!” to violations of positive American values
  • Employs nonviolent direct action and attitude, including civil disobedience
  • Targets power-holders and institutions
  • Puts problems & policies in public spotlight
  • Uses strategy as well as tactics
  • Does work that is courageous, exciting, risky
  • Shows in behavior the moral superiority of movement values

Ineffective:

  • Promotes anti-leadership, anti-organization rules and structure
  • Attached to an identity as lonely voice on society’s fringe
  • Uses tactics without realistic strategy
  • Has victim attitude, behavior: angry, judgmental, dogmatic
  • Uses rhetoric of self-righteousness, absolute truth, moral superiority
  • Can be strident: personal upset more important than movement’s need

Change Agent

Effective:

  • Believes in people power: builds mass-based grassroots groups, networks
  • Nurtures growth of natural leaders
  • Chooses strategies for long-term movement development rather than focusing only on immediate demands
  • Uses training to build skills, democratize decisions, diversify and broaden organization and coalitions
  • Promotes alternatives and paradigm shifts

Ineffective:

  • Has tunnel vision: advocates single approach while opposing those doing all others
  • Promotes patriarchal leadership styles
  • Promotes only minor reform
  • Stifles emergence of diversity and ignores needs of activists
  • Promotes visions of perfection cut off from practical political and social struggle